Apple Ordered To Comply With Court Decision On In-App Payments In Epic Games Lawsuit

[kafa88]

A federal judge has ruled that Apple cannot push back the deadline for updating App Store policies, as previously ordered in the California court ruling against Epic Games v. Apple. Although Apple won most of the lawsuits when a judge declared that Apple was not acting as a monopoly, as Epic Games alleged, the court sided with the maker of Fortnite over Apple's anti-compulsion policy on restrictions on in-app purchases.

The court's original ruling stated that Apple would no longer be allowed to ban developers from pointing to a payment method other than Apple's own payment system, but Apple wanted that ruling to be withheld until further notice. Appeal decision which is an effective delay Pushing the App Store Changes Back in a Few Years

Older players will think that playing online slots is like a cabinet game in the สมัครสมาชิก slotxo old days. It has a very smart system. But if you think that playing slots like a cabinet. Its operating system is smart. Let me tell you that it is not equivalent to online slots. because online slots What is smarter than a slot machine? It can be remembered that What symbols happened before?

Specifically, the September 10, 2021 ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic Games' antitrust case has ordered Apple not to stop developers from:

court also said Apple could not prevent developers from communicating with customers through a contact point voluntarily received from customers through account registration within the app.In October, Apple officially updated its App Store rules to address the ability of developers to communicate with users. This is because the changes are part of a deal with US developers. In the same lawsuit, however, the Epic Games appeal